WORDING - Repair wording without changing the kind by accident
Preface node
heading:wording-repair-wording-without-changing-the-kind-by-accident:574
What this page is
This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.
Methodology
Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.
Content
- Situation and question. A sentence sounds fluent but hides which object, relation, slot, use position, or claim kind is active. Ask: what was the pre-repair kind and which invariant is preserved after rewriting?
- Optional obstacle. A trigger word has been replaced while ontology, admissible use, or scope drifted.
- Template A.
E.10 Solution -> KindRestorationCheck. Local basis adds the exact span, pre-repair kind, relation, position, use, and scope, post-repair settlement, governing-pattern ref, and disposition. - Boundaries. Stop when the repaired wording preserves or explicitly changes the kind by accepted decision and remains understandable under MG-DA. Return when the sentence's EntityOfConcern, use, or scope changes. Wrong-turn recovery rejects lexical substitution without semantic check. Stronger neighbors are F.19 for phrase-level prose repair, F.18 for durable naming, or the direct domain pattern for ontology repair.
- Public coarsening. "Wording repair" restores to
KindRestorationCheckplus the changed sentence.
Last Updated: 2026-07-12 — upstream FPF commit 44dd8818 (github.com/ailev/FPF)