G.11:Ext.DecayAndDebt
Preface node
heading:g-11-ext-decayanddebt:107114
What this page is
This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.
Methodology
Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.
Content
PatternScopeId: G.11:Ext.DecayAndDebt
GPatternExtensionId: DecayAndDebt
GPatternExtensionKind: DisciplineSpecific
GoverningPatternId: B.3.4 (use-qualified currentness and interpreted planning debt)
Uses: {B.3.4, G.6}
⊑ and ⊑⁺: ∅
Required pins, edition pins, and policy pins (minimum):
- The receiving claim/use and the changed premise or applicable review condition, with source references where published.
FreshnessWindowDeclRef?,DecayPolicyIdRef?orEpistemicDebtBudgetRef?only when the adopted window, deterioration model or planning measure is used. Their source supplies the meaning; no default expiry or debt budget is required.PathSliceId[]for the dependent claims and uses actually affected, not every use of an old carrier.
RSCRTriggerKindIds: {RSCRTriggerKindId.FreshnessOrDecayEvent, RSCRTriggerKindId.EvidenceSurfaceEdit, RSCRTriggerKindId.BaselineBindingEdit}
Notes (wiring-only): B.3.4 determines what the trigger means for the use. Continue, narrow, refresh, suspend or an authorized exception remain available where warranted; no Refresh/Deprecate/Waive triad or automatic downgrade is introduced here. Currentness is not assurance of the underlying claim. Budget and priority logic apply only when their interpreted policies are used.
Last Updated: 2026-09-08 — upstream FPF commit f6ee315e (github.com/ailev/FPF)