FPF Reference

    F.0.1:9.4 Type reasoning — subclass‑of (OWL) vs is‑a (plain)

    Preface node heading:f-0-1-9-4-type-reasoning-subclass-of-owl-vs-is-a-plain:69118

    What this page is

    This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

    Methodology

    Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

    Content

    • Context A: OWL2_Profiles - description logics SenseCell⟨subclass@OWL⟩: Tech “subclass‑of”; Plain “is‑a”.

    • Context B: ENG_Glossary - engineering plain usage compendium SenseCell⟨is‑a@ENG⟩: Tech “is‑a (engineering)”; Plain “kind‑of”; Gloss “informal subsumption in specs.”

    • Bridge: ⟨subclass@OWL⟩ ↔⟨near‑equivalent, CL=1, loss: “OWL formal constraints absent in ENG”; fit: “intended subsumption semantics.”⟩ ⟨is‑a@ENG⟩

    • Concept‑Set hint: Keep separate rows unless the consuming artefact demands formal semantics.

    Last Updated: 2026-06-08 — upstream FPF commit 093d30e8 (github.com/ailev/FPF)