CAUSAL-USE - Bound causal language before using it for action
Preface node
heading:causal-use-bound-causal-language-before-using-it-for-action:547
What this page is
This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.
Methodology
Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.
Content
- Situation and question. Causal, intervention, effect, policy, or counterfactual language is being used to support a decision or action. Ask: what causal-use rung and support basis are actually available?
- Optional obstacle. Association, intervention, and counterfactual claims are being treated as interchangeable.
- Template A.
C.28 Solution -> CausalUseTriageRecord. This is the initial template; local basis adds the live causal wording, target use, candidate rung, comparator or counterfactual, and support-basis refs. - Boundaries. Stop at the triage record when it honestly bounds supported and unsupported use. Return when intervention, comparator, target population, evidence, or causal-use purpose changes. Wrong-turn recovery downgrades causal laundering to the supported claim. Stronger neighbors are CausalUseEvidenceDesignRecord or CausalUseSupportVerdict inside C.28, C.11 for choice, and direct evidence or work patterns.
- Public coarsening. "Causal check" restores to
CausalUseTriageRecord.
Last Updated: 2026-07-12 — upstream FPF commit 44dd8818 (github.com/ailev/FPF)