| Graph-as-architecture | The E.18 graph is called the architecture. | Use C.30 for the grounded architecture claim, selected architecture-relevant structure, or conditional architecture description, and keep this relation only for flow or transduction structure. |
| Graph-as-functional-architecture | A TGA graph is treated as the functional architecture itself. | Split functional structure from flow or transduction structure and add correspondence. |
| Flow-as-work-log | Path or slice wording is treated as work occurrence. | Assign occurrence or result claims to A.15 or P2W and keep TGA as graph or path relation. |
| Crossing-as-gate-result | A crossing relation is treated as gate passage. | Assign gate-decision claims to A.21 and keep crossing relation under E.18. |
| Valuation-as-score | A flow valuation is used as a generic architecture score. | State E.18 valuation and set-return discipline; assign measurement, characterization, selection, or candidate-set claims to C.16 or an admitted governing pattern when those claims are being made. |
| Generated relation-graph proof | A code-agent relation graph or probe output is used as proof of architecture understanding or safety. | Recover source, source observation class selected from {observed, inferred, unknown}, hidden structure, and evidence or assurance pattern governing the claim applications. |
| Prompt-data-tool flow as authority proof | A prompt, data, or tool-flow graph is treated as permission for tool action or proof that authority is safe. | Keep the graph as a flow relation. A path from untrusted content to tool action is governed by SecurityTrustBoundaryStructure, C.24, E.16, A.20, or A.21 when those claim kinds are being made. |