C.30.TGA-FLOW-REL:7 - Conformance Checklist

Preface node heading:c-30-tga-flow-rel-7-conformance-checklist:54589

What this page is

This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

Methodology

Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

Content

IDRequirementFailed-check repair
CC-TGA-FLOW-1 E.18 object.The relation names the E.18 graph, path, slice, crossing, or flow valuation object it uses.Add the E.18 object reference named by value or use C.30 or C.30.ASV without TGA relation.
CC-TGA-FLOW-2 Architecture locus.The relation names ArchitectureOf@Context, selected architecture-relevant structure, architecture structural view, or conditional ArchitectureDescription@Context use it relates to.Add architectureClaimRef, selectedArchitectureStructureRefs, architectureStructuralViewRef, or architectureDescriptionRef when durable description use is being made; otherwise keep the graph claim inside E.18 only.
CC-TGA-FLOW-3 Functional and flow separation.Functional structure and flow or transduction structure remain separate unless a correspondence is declared.Add FunctionFlowRelationNote or remove the functional-architecture claim from the graph sentence.
CC-TGA-FLOW-4 No TGA architecture takeover.The TGA graph is not treated as generic architecture ontology or all architecture structure kinds.Assign grounded architecture claims, selected architecture-relevant structures, or conditional architecture-description use to C.30 and keep this pattern to flow or transduction structure.
CC-TGA-FLOW-5 No work overread.A graph, path, or slice is not treated as work occurrence or work result.Assign the work claim to A.15 or the governing work-result pattern.
CC-TGA-FLOW-6 No evidence, assurance, or gate overread.The relation is not used as evidence sufficiency, assurance claim, gate decision, or release permission without evidence named by value, assurance, gate, or release pattern application.Assign the claim being made to A.10, G.6, B.3, A.20, A.21, or the release locus named by value when a release claim is being made.
CC-TGA-FLOW-7 Causal and mathematical boundaries.Causal or intervention claims and mathematical-lens claims are assigned to C.28 and C.29.Apply those governing patterns or narrow the relation's admissible use.
CC-TGA-FLOW-8 Pin and scalarization boundary.Edition, context, and plane pins plus no-hidden-scalarization claims remain E.18-governed.Add E.18 pin and set-return references or remove the comparison or selection claim.
CC-TGA-FLOW-9 Source return.Extracted, generated, coarsened, or partial graphs state source-return conditions when hidden distinctions affect action.Add source-return condition or narrow the admissible use.
CC-TGA-FLOW-10 Useful action.The repair leaves a surviving move: name graph, path, or crossing relation; add correspondence; return to source; assign the claim being made to a governing pattern; or stop.Restore that move, or classify the phrase as reduced-use cue, quote-only wording, blocked transfer, or incomplete rewrite.
CC-TGA-FLOW-11 Lowering and currentness.The relation states the smallest changed locus when E.18 semantics or pins, source observation class, architecture locus, correspondence, source return, or neighboring governing boundary changes.Update the affected reference, narrow admissible use, keep the graph claim inside E.18, apply the governing pattern to the non-flow claim, lower the relation, or block architecture-flow use.

Last Updated: 2026-06-08 — upstream FPF commit 093d30e8 (github.com/ailev/FPF)