FPF Reference

    C.30.TGA-FLOW-REL:3 - Forces

    Preface node heading:c-30-tga-flow-rel-3-forces:54410

    What this page is

    This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

    Methodology

    Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

    Content

    ForceTension
    Flow relation vs architecture takeoverE.TGA graph, path, or crossing relation can be essential, but it does not become all architecture ontology.
    Functional view vs flow viewA functional structure view may need a flow relation, but a graph, path, or crossing object is not a functional element by itself.
    Graph precision vs work overreadE.18 gives precise graph, path, and flow-valuation objects; work occurrence and work results remain outside TGA unless their own pattern governs the claim being made.
    No-hidden-scalarization vs architecture scoringE.18 set-return and no-hidden-scalarization discipline can inform architecture reasoning, but it does not become a general architecture score.
    Small relation vs unneeded non-architecture apparatusA project often needs one relation record, not a full C.29 lens card, evidence path, assurance case, or decision record.
    E.18 stability vs C.30 integrationA TGA-based architecture claim, selected flow or transduction structure, architecture structural view, or conditional architecture-description use needs a relation to E.18 without rewriting E.TGA as generic architecture adequacy theory.

    Last Updated: 2026-06-08 — upstream FPF commit 093d30e8 (github.com/ailev/FPF)