C.3.A:C.4 Worked examples [I]
Preface node
heading:c-3-a-c-4-worked-examples-i:45814
What this page is
This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.
Methodology
Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.
Content
ESG braking policy. The claim pins VehicleSignature@v4 and the dry/wet TargetSlice. The consumer is restricted to PassengerCar, and SubkindOfObtains(PassengerCar, Vehicle; plantVehicleScheme) holds under the paired exact declaration editions. For VIN-17, evaluate J(VIN-17, PassengerCar, passengerCarEdition, TargetSlice)=true; C.3.1 monotonicity then supplies the Vehicle-side classification needed by the universal claim. An unavailable brake-configuration dependency would yield unknown, and the transition would refuse separately.
Risk-score Work entry and occurrence. ComputeRiskScore capability is considered for request req-884 in JobSlice api-v2.3/eu-west/t-204. The entry guard evaluates the request under the pinned AuthenticatedRequest signature. If true, it may admit execution; no Work occurrence yet follows. After execution, actual W = RiskScoreRun-2026-07-22T10:03Z-884 : U.Work is independently grounded as the dated world-side occurrence. RiskScoreRunLog-884 is a separate episteme designating W. The output score value is a separate candidate evaluated under its declared output kind and signature edition.
Cross-context plant use. The source claim and source kind cross via separate Scope and KindBridge channels. Plant-B recovers its own target declaration and evaluates exact TransportUnit candidate TU-9. Bridge assertions affect R; they do not classify TU-9 or create the later Work occurrence.
Last Updated: 2026-07-28 — upstream FPF commit 17edd955 (github.com/ailev/FPF)