| Interface-as-promiser (“the API promises…”) | Epistemes and publication carriers are descriptions; they do not commit | Recover the exact policy and generic prescription, or name the actual duty bearer and separately obtaining U.Commitment when an individual duty is claimed. Keep any assignment as a rule ground and the API, signature, or interface description as a description episteme or publication carrier. |
| Guarantee-without-substrate | The word hides whether the claim is semantic, deontic, an entry condition, or observed or evaluated | Classify semantic law as L, a generic prescription or claim about an exact individual commitment or current grant as D, an entry predicate as A, and an observed or evaluated claim as E; use A6-AW-* for permission-looking wording. |
| SLA smuggled into laws | Mixes governance with semantics; breaks substitution reasoning | Put SLA targets as D claims referencing L-defined metrics and E evidence |
| Gate written as obligation | Confuses admissibility predicates with deontic claims | Write the predicate as A; write a generic prescription or separately instituted individual duty as a D→A reference. |
| Work-result-evidence bundle | “The delivered work and its log prove acceptance” makes one phrase carry occurrence, result, transfer, evidence, and verdict | Name the A.15.1 Work first; then use one A.15.1:4.6 row for each current result, delivery/transfer, evidence, or acceptance claim. Omit absent rows. |
| Face-level paraphrase drift | A face silently changes a claim's object or quadrant | Cite the canonical claim ID, direct object, and selected A6-AW-* row rather than restating it |
| Cross-scale contract collapse | Commitments, grants, and conflict findings at different scales are treated as one D claim | Keep commitments and current grants as separate D claims; classify the permission conflict finding as E through A6-AW-CONFLICT; use mediation only under its subject pattern |