| Interface-as-promiser (“the API promises…”) | Epistemes and publication carriers are descriptions; they do not commit | Name the committing role assignment or admitted acting system; classify as a D claim; keep the API, signature, or interface description as description episteme or publication carrier |
| Guarantee-without-substrate | The word hides whether the claim is semantic, governance, entry, or observed/evaluated | Classify semantic law as L, accountable commitment/current grant as D, entry predicate as A, and observed/evaluated claim as E; use A6-AW-* for permission-looking wording |
| SLA smuggled into laws | Mixes governance with semantics; breaks substitution reasoning | Put SLA targets as D claims referencing L-defined metrics and E evidence |
| Gate written as obligation | Confuses admissibility predicates with duties | Write predicate as A; write duty-to-gate as D→A reference |
| Work-result-evidence bundle | “The delivered work and its log prove acceptance” makes one phrase carry occurrence, result, transfer, evidence, and verdict | Name the A.15.1 Work first; then use one A.15.1:4.6 row for each current result, delivery/transfer, evidence, or acceptance claim. Omit absent rows. |
| Face-level paraphrase drift | A face silently changes a claim's object or quadrant | Cite the canonical claim ID, direct object, and selected A6-AW-* row rather than restating it |
| Cross-scale contract collapse | Commitments, grants, and conflict findings at different scales are treated as one D claim | Keep commitments and current grants as separate D claims; classify the permission conflict finding as E through A6-AW-CONFLICT; use mediation only under its exact owner |