FPF Reference

    6. Prepare evidence, assurance, or gate decisions before commitment

    Preface node heading:6-prepare-evidence-assurance-or-gate-decisions-before-commitment:504

    What this page is

    This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

    Methodology

    Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

    Content

    Use this when a project cannot responsibly act yet because evidence, assurance, constraints, gate validity, or decision permission is unclear.

    FPF helps you separate what is being claimed from the evidence path, assurance argument, internal constraint validity, gate decision, local choice, and performed work. That separation matters when the cost of acting too early is high.

    Typical first result: a commitment-readiness note that lists the claim, the evidence or assurance still needed, the gate or decision condition, and the work that remains blocked until those checks exist.

    First inspect: A.10, B.3, A.20, A.21, C.11, C.28, and the relevant work or architecture pattern if the claim is about planned or performed work.

    Last Updated: 2026-06-08 — upstream FPF commit 093d30e8 (github.com/ailev/FPF)